The magazine of the Melbourne PC User Group
Getting the Point
Gordon Woolf |
|
|
You may get involved with Latin magpies, but it could be worse: printers
have given up on mignon that's inedible and canons that don't fire. Gordon
Woolf explains... |
We all need printed material of some kind, and in the process of getting it we
are introduced to some oddities of the language in which printers confer. It's a
language that goes back centuries. Our introduction comes from using word
processing programs, more so with page layout programs.
When printers were obliged to change from Imperial measurements to metric, they
changed easily. Just convert from ancient measurements to and from centimetres
and millimetres as they had previously converted to and from inches. The end
user was still left puzzled with talk of points, picas and ems.
One of the problems is that when you look at type that is supposedly the same
size, it can look very different, as in the examples in Figure 1 below. The
reason for that, is that the point size is based on the height of the metal slug
on which a type character was made. That was in the days when Movable Type was a
description of how things were printed, not the name of a popular blog software.
What you can be certain about is that a specific number of lines of the same
size type placed beneath each other will occupy the same depth on the page. Six
lines of 12 point type make an inch, or 2.54 centimetres. Or at least they do
now. It was not always so.
A4 Easier Than Paper
Elephants
Now having got the truth about type sizes clear in your mind, we can turn
to the paper the type will be printed on. Fortunately, in this, we have
become thoroughly up to date with a very simple mMetric system. The paper
you normally use will be A4, and that, cut in half across it's width,
creates two sheets of A5. Every sheet is in the same proportions, based on
the square root of 2, so a layout created for A4 can be printed on A5 by
reducing it overall to 71 per cent of the original. Getting from A3 to A4
similarly means a 71 per cent reduction.
Of course, it is not always so easy, and there are other ranges, of sizes
as well as the "A" range, known as B and C. They are somewhat larger,
intended for uses where a job has to be trimmed after printing, or changed
into something else (known as "converting") such as in making envelopes.
Standard sizes of paper also make it easy to compare weights of paper, and
everything is compared in "grams per square metre" so you can easily see
that A4 paper at 70gsm is lighter paper than A3 paper at 80gsm.
OK, were you feeling sorry for having to have awkward conversions from
points to millimetres? Feel sad no more. In paper, the USA has a very
different system. The weight is defined as the weight of 500 sheets of the
paper in the size it was cut from.
Most letter size paper (slightly wider and shorter than A4) is sold as 20
lb but a heavier paper might be made. in a different size sheet
originally, so a very thin card of exactly the same grams-per-square-meter
weight might be described as being 28 lb.
That abbreviation "b" for pound may need explaining, also useful to those
of you who have grandkids with Tamagotchi electronic toys. It's those
Americans still using the abbreviation for the Latin word libra to mean
pounds.
Other paper sizes in the US are known by names such as legal, ledger,
post, crown, demy and, strangely for a republic, crown and royal. You may
occasionally find an elephant (28 x 23 inches) and a sheet known as a
double elephant was originally used for wallpaper before they started
making much longer rolls. |
Black and White
This brings us to another core measurement for type — the Pica, pronounced
"piker" just like the Australian term for someone who wants to opt out of the
crowd. Collingwood supporters may like to know that the word derives from the
Latin for magpie, perhaps indicating the colours in which most books were (and
are) printed.
There are 12 points to a Pica and the Pica, conveniently for Americans is now
exactly 6 to the inch, which makes it devilishly difficult to accurately convert
to millimetres.
The Brits and the Yanks used to have 72.27 points to the inch, and the change to
72 was not the decision of some international committee. Chuck Geschke and John
Warnock were working at Xerox Parc (that's Parc for Palo Alto Research Center,
not as in lawns and shrubs) when even the powerful computers of that time would
have had trouble doing large numbers of calculations to two decimal places, so
they created the Postscript printer description language with just 72 points to
an inch.
I've seen that story referred to as apocryphal, so 1 asked and Mr Warnock told
me the story was in fact true — adding that "because fonts had to be recreated
for PostScript, we believed that no great harm would be done by making the
assumption".
Those two people, who founded the Adobe software company really did change the
world of printing. But we are getting ahead of ourselves...
Type sizes were defined in a somewhat different way from the 15th Century in
Europe, when sizes progressed through brilliant, diamond, pearl, nonpareille,
colonel (or mignon), petit, borgis, corpus, cicero, mittel, tertia and up as far
as small canon, and canon, the latter being about 36pt type in our present
measurements.
Instead of asking for that address to be a point larger, you could have asked,
in French of course, for the
colonel to be petit. In other words from
about this (7pt) to this (8pt). And the headline could be changed from a small canon (33pt) to a large canon (43pt). Those
terms lasted quite a while though by the 1940s a reference book said canon were
outdated and should be measured in ciceros.
The King's Foot
Ambroise Didot, a Frenchman, created some real standards in 1784, when he
related the point to the French foot, the royal foot, specifically the King's
foot. So one foot was divided into 12 pouces, one pouce into 12 lignes, the ligne was divided into 12 points. One point was 1/1728 of the King's foot.
Then just five years later along came the French Revolution and just as English
speaking printers were to do when metric measurements entered their world, the
French printers decided that they'd go on with points and that there would be 2660 points to one meter. (Have I just rewritten
history? No, just simplified it a little.)
You will also hear a pica referred to as an em because an em is 12 points, but,
just to get you really confused, it does not have to be. If you hear a width mentioned in multiple "ems", such as that a column in
PC Update is 14 ems wide it will mean that it is 14 picas wide. However, an em is named after the letter M which, in most
typefaces is a square character, so a
the letter M in a 12pt type will usually be 12 points wide, the same as a pica.
If the first line of each paragraph was to be indented, it would probably be indented by a square of the height of the type, and that would be called an
em — if it was 10 point type the indent was 10 points.
By now you may be thinking that it is all designed to confuse you. Let me assure you that this is so. (Should I have had "not" in there somewhere? I wonder...).
About the Author
Gordon Woolf is a long-time Melb PC member who once rebuilt a British Vertical
printing press and has been narrowly missed by a spurt of molten type from a
typesetting machine, but who prefers computers even though they are no more
predictable.
Reprinted from the July 2006 issue of PC Update, the magazine of Melbourne PC User Group, Australia
|