The magazine of the Melbourne PC User Group
Phones May Not Hurt You, But Shopping Might
Gordon Woolf |
|
|
Gordon Woolf finds good news for those in hospitals
but danger lurking in shops |
You won't be allowed to take or make a mobile phone call while in an operating
theatre, but
many hospitals worldwide may relax their rules on mobile phones and wireless
devices such as Blackberry- coupled laptops and hand held units following the
latest research published in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings "Use of Cellular
Telephones in the Hospital Environment"'
The tests, conducted in Rochester, Minnesota, USA, from February to June last
year showed no cases of phones in normal usage, including Blackberry devices,
interfering with medical equipment. Other studies have shown interference could
occur if you place your phone within two inches of the data port on a
ventilator, or have the phone within two inches of the machine when it rings.
Cell phones alter their power output based on the incoming signal. Where the
incoming signal is weak, mobile phones transmit at a higher power, so the tests
measured reception levels to take this into account.
The tests did not cover areas where patients would not be likely to take calls,
such as operating suites, but I heard recently of a job seeker answering a
mobile call while expecting those interviewing him to wait, so anything is
possible. The urge to answer that ring is so strong that it might create an
automatic response even in a coma, but that's my comment, not the clinic's.
The myth that mobile phones cause explosions at service stations was debunked
long ago, and my guess would be that the ban might be justified by the trader
not wanting someone occupying space by a petrol pump while they are neither
filling the tank nor paying for the fuel. That interviewing panel mentioned
above would be sympathetic.
Not a myth is the tale that heart pacemakers can be upset by those tag-checking
security devices standing in the entrances of many stores. A case much reported
in the USA was of an elderly woman who had been seated against the back of the
electronic article surveillance (EAS) device. She passed out and needed to be
revived several times before a staff member decided to move her away; she then
recovered quickly.
EAS dangers are covered in a report, again from the Mayo Clinic2, which states
that while there is general advice on the lines of "don't linger, don't lean",
EAS systems may still be positioned near checkout counters and/ or near items
for sale so people are tempted to do just that.
A 71-year-old man felt a little odd when he was at a checkout counter and was
affected so much that he staggered away from the counter. From the details
recorded in the defibrillator the man had in his chest, the hospital was able to
check what happened and when. Luckily the man staggered just far enough to take him out of
range of the tag-checking unit.
The report, by Drs Gimbel and Cox, states: "Architects and designers of retail
space might avoid placing the checkout area (spaces where lingering is likely to
occur) close to where EAS systems will be positioned..." and added that "items
of interest should not be positioned in such a way as to encourage prolonged
proximal exposure to an EAS system."
They were concerned that EAS systems may be "camouflaged" by advertising,
rendering them invisible to the customer or, worse, drawing the customer with an
implantable device toward them.
There seems to be no danger in just walking past such devices.
QUOTE:
Mobile phones are the only subject on which men boast about who's got the
smallest.
— Neil Kinnock
The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of
messenger boys.
— Sir William Preece, chief engineer of the British Post Office,
1876.
Reprinted from the April 2007 issue of PC Update, the magazine of Melbourne PC User Group, Australia
|